000			01821cab a2200229 4500
001			L129156
008			050324n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129156
041			_aeng
100			_aWilliams, Peter J G
245		4	_aThe Court of Appeal's views on part 3 of the DDA
260			_c2005
490			_aAccess by Design _v (102) Spring 2005, 6-9(4)
520			_aConsiders two recent CA decisions which centred around interpretation of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 Part III. This lists seven relevant factors in the determination of whether service providers have made reasonable disabled provision. "Ross v Ryanair Ltd"( [2004] EWCA Civ 1751, [2005] NPC 5) concerns the charge of £18 made by Ryanair for Ross to hire a wheelchair for use at Stansted Airport. CA determined the cost was unreasonable and the appeal was held. "Roads v Central Trains Ltd" ( [2004] EWCA Civ 1541, unreported) examined the case of a wheelchair user who needed to cross from one platform to another at Thetford station. A taxi was not provided to transport Roads down a difficult lane and suggested alternatives were not suitable. Central was held on appeal to be responsible, but CA considered the cost of a taxi may have been unreasonable in this instance. Examines the policy behind the meanings of service provider, differing impairments and reasonableness in the Act. Concludes that a reasonable alternative method of making a service available is even more complicated than originally envisaged.
590			_aIKA150405
650			_aDISABILITY DISCRIMINATION ACT 1995 PART III
650			_aROADS V CENTRAL TRAINS LTD
650			_aROSS V RYANAIR LTD AND ANOTHER
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-DISCRIMINATION-DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION
700			_aWaugh, Richard
942			_n0
999			_c74973 _d74973