| 000 | 01833cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS68857 | ||
| 008 | 050329n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u129186 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aNorthampton Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Land Securities Properties Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 520 | _a[2005] EWHC 168 (Admin), 7 February 2005. Considers whether the installation of a mezzanine floor for additional retail floor space could reasonably be described as new development within the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s55 in the context of a planning permission condition that sought to impose an upper limit on non-food retail floor space. Appeal by N to quash the decision of the planning inspector, appointed by SoS, to allow an appeal by L against N's refusal to issue L with a lawful development certificate after N had built the mezzanine without planning permission. "Held": appeal allowed. The condition did not simply limit the amount of floor space that could be submitted for detailed approval. Provided that the total amount of non-retail floor space did not exceed the amount permitted under the planning condition, occupiers could make under s55(2)(a) of the Act any internal alterations they wanted to. A commonsense approach would reasonably describe the creation of extra retail floor space in the form of a mezzanine as new retail development in the context of a planning condition that sought to place an upper limit on non-food retail space. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING APPLICATIONS | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/168.html _zView the judgment at www.bailii.org... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c74985 _d74985 |
||