000			01862cab a2200217 4500
001			ABS68870
008			050329n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129188
245			_aAkumah (FC) v London Borough of Hackney
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] UKHL 17, 3 March 2005. Considers whether the regulation and control of vehicle parking on a housing estate is a proper function of a local authority in the management of a housing estate under the Housing Act 1985 s21(1) and whether it facilitates, is conducive or incidental to a local authority's management of houses in the estate within the Local Government Act 1972 s111. Appeal by tenant (A) against the decision ([2002] EWCA Civ 582) dismissing his claim against the respondent local authority (H) for redress for parking ticket fines that A had been made to pay under H's estate parking scheme and damages for his car being wrongfully detained by clamping. "Held": appeal dismissed. Regulation and control of parking is an inherent part of managing the houses in a housing estate under s21(1) of the 1985 Act. S111 of the 1972 Act gave local authorities powers to do anything that was calculated to facilitate, was conducive or incidental to, the discharge of any of their functions. Parking regulation and control constituted a proper discharge of H's management of the houses on the estate. View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aAKUMAH (FC) V LONDON BOROUGH OF HACKNEY
650			_aHOUSING ACT 1985 S21(1)
650			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 S111
650			_aPARKING
650			_aHOUSING ESTATES
690			_aPROPERTY MANAGEMENT-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
856			_uhttps://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200405/ldjudgmt/jd050303/hack.htm _zView the judgment on the UK Parliament website...
942			_n0
999			_c74986 _d74986