000			01026cab a2200253 4500
001			WB2916-20
008			090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u11760
041			_aeng
245			_aSubject to contract
260			_c1993
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(9316) 24 April 1993, 128(1)
520			_aDiscusses "Salomon v Akiens" (1993), where the tenant failed to apply for a new tenancy since negotiations were almost completed with the landlord for a lease by agreement. This fell through but all negotiations were `subject to contract` or `subject to lease`. Questions for the CA were if there was a contract and if there was an estoppel.
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S24
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
650			_aLEASE RENEWAL
650			_aSUBJECT TO CONTRACT
650			_aWITHOUT PREJUDICE
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c7506 _d7506