| 000 | 01408cab a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L129344 | ||
| 008 | 050413n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u129344 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBickford-Smith, Stephen | ||
| 245 | _aLand injunctions | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors' Journal _v149(13) 1 April 2005, 376-378(3) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the ways in which a court will grant injunctive relief to protect ownership and rights in land. Poses three crucial questions: does a claimant have to apply for an interim injunction to restrain the work if he is to retain his right to an injunction at trial; when will he be granted damages rather than an injunction; and how will those damages be assessed? Refers to case law including the recent cases, "Harris v Williams-Wynne" ([2005] EWHC 151 (Ch), LTL 14 February 2005) and "Mortimer v Bailey" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1514, Abs68661). | ||
| 590 | _aIKA150405 | ||
| 650 | _aAMEC DEVELOPMENTS LTD V JURY'S HOTEL MANAGEMENT (UK) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aSHELFER V CITY OF LONDON ELECTRIC LIGHTING CO | ||
| 650 | _aPUGH V HOWELLS | ||
| 650 | _aJAGGARD V SAWYER AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aHARRIS V WILLIAMS-WYNNE | ||
| 650 | _aMIDTOWN LTD V CITY OF LONDON REAL PROPERTY CO LTD | ||
| 650 | _aPATEL V WH SMITH (EZIOT) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aMORTIMER AND ANOTHER V BAILEY AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75079 _d75079 |
||