| 000 | 01447cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L129452 | ||
| 008 | 050420n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u129452 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aPemble, Stuart | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA shot over the bows | |
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0514) 9 April 2005 123(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines recent CA rulings on the adjudication and payment provisions of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 Part II. Supporters of adjudication will welcome the decisions in "AMEC Capital Projects Ltd v Whitefriars City Estates Ltd" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1418, [2005] 1 ALL ER 723) and "Collins (Contractors) Ltd v Baltic Quay Management (1994) Ltd" ([2004] EWCA Civ 1757, [2005] BLR 63) as they limit the ability of an unsuccessful party to question the adjudicators jurisdiction. Adjudicators are also not obliged to consider jurisdictional challenges, although when time permits adjudicators are advised to allow parties to make jurisdiction submissions. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA290405 | ||
| 650 | _aAMEC CAPITAL PROJECTS LTD V WHITEFRIARS CITY ESTATES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCOLLINS (CONTRACTORS) LTD V BALTIC QUAY MANAGEMENT (1994) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 PART II | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75115 _d75115 |
||