| 000 | 01102cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L129495 | ||
| 008 | 050425n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u129495 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aTenant's counter-notice - validity issues: Lancecrest Ltd v Ganiyu Asiwaju | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aCommercial Leases _v19(4) April 2005, 973-975(3) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the issues raised in the case, "Lancecrest Ltd v Ganiyu Asiwaju" ([2005] EWCA Civ 117): whether time is of the essence in a landlord serving a notice to trigger a rent review and whether a letter sent by the tenant in response to the notice was sufficient counter-notice. It was decided that time was not of the essence in regards to the trigger notice but was of the essence for the counter-notice. The letter sent by the tenant was held to be a valid counter-notice. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA290405 | ||
| 650 | _aLANCECREST LTD V GANIYU ASIWAJU | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-RENT REVIEW (BUSINESS TENANCIES) | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75127 _d75127 |
||