000			02127cab a2200217 4500
001			L129524
008			050426n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129524
041			_aeng
245			_a9 Cornwall Crescent London Limited v the Mayor and Burgesses of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.
260			_c2005
490			_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2006] 1 P&CR 3
520			_a[2005] EWCA Civ 324, 9 February 2005. Considers whether a proposed purchase price for a freehold in a landlord's counter-notice under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s21 had to be realistic following the requirement from "Cadogan v Morris" ([1999] 1 EGLR 59, Abs60002). Appeal by appellant tenants (C), who had sought to exercise their right of collective enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, against the dismissal of their claim challenging the validity of the respondent landlord's (K) counter-notice. C had served a s13 notice on K to acquire the freehold for £210. K's s21 counter-notice proposed a price of £130 000 based on a professional valuation, which C rejected as an unrealistically high price. C sought to proceed with the acquisition at their price in default of a valid counter-notice. The judge found that K's counter-notice was valid and its price proposal bona fide. "Held": appeal dismissed. The "Cadogan" test did not apply to s21 counter-notices. The judge had been correct to find that lack of good faith was the sole necessary pre-condition for a declaration of the invalidity of a landlord's counter-notice under the provisions of the Act.
590			_aIKA290405
650			_aNINE CORNWALL CRESCENT LONDON LTD V KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA LBC
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S21
650			_aVISCOUNT CHELSEA V MORRIS
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/324.html _zView the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75149 _d75149