000			01311cab a2200217 4500
001			L129600
008			050505n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129600
041			_aeng
100			_aRoss, Jonathan
245			_aCase law: Beazer Homes Limited v Stroude
260			_c2005
490			_aProperty Week _v70(15) 15 April 2005, 67(1)
520			_aDiscusses the case Beazer Homes v Peter Stroude ([2005] EWCA Civ 265) where the parties disagreed over the construction of an agreement made in relation to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s106 and the Highways Act 1980 concerning a development involving the construction of a bypass. The dispute was over whether Stroude (S) had a right over certain land for the construction of the bypass. S claimed s106 agreement gave him express right of access but the appellants (B) claimed there should be mutual rights which had been the subject of earlier negotiations. The appeal was dismissed: the court held that it could only consider the factual background of the agreement not the intentions of the parties.
590			_aIKA190505
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650			_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980
650			_aBEAZER HOMES LIMITED V PETER STROUDE
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c75176 _d75176