| 000 | 01073cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L129635 | ||
| 008 | 050506n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u129635 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, Tony | ||
| 245 | _aIt's a Pope thing | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v270(8378) 22 April 2005, 58-59(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the problems associated with deciding burden of proof in the context of "Stephens v Cannon" ([2005] EWCA Civ 222, Abs68867), where the trial judge was unable to decide which side's expert evidence should be favoured. He decided for the defendant but the claimant appealed. The CA said that not striving to make a decision was excusable in exceptional cases, but if the adjudicator or summary arbitrator cannot decide then there should be a full reasoned explanation as to what the processes were. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA190505 | ||
| 650 | _aSTEPHENS AND ANOTHER V CANNON AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-EXPERT WITNESSES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75193 _d75193 |
||