000			01413cab a2200217 4500
001			L129696
008			050511n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129696
041			_aeng
245			_aRestrictive covenants: recent cases clarify interpretation and drafting
260			_c2005
490			_aThe In-House Lawyer _v(129) April 2005, 31-33(3)
520			_aLooks at four recent cases that help clarify the law relating to restrictive covenants. Sets out how a restrictive covenant works and what makes it enforceable. "Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister" (Abs67766) clarified identification of the land that benefits from the covenant; two cases. "Martin v David Wilson Homes Ltd" (Abs68379) and "Jarvis Homes Ltd v Marshall" (Abs67981), both concerned a covenant restricting the use of a property to a private residence only and its interpretation. "Mortimer v Bailey" (Abs68661) considered whether the person benefiting from a restrictive covenant was entitled to an injunction to demolish unauthorised works.
590			_aIKA190505
650			_aCREST NICHOLSON RESIDENTIAL (SOUTH) LTD V MCALLISTER
650			_aMARTIN V DAVID WILSON HOMES LTD
650			_aJARVIS HOMES LTD V MARSHALL AND ANOTHER
650			_aMORTIMER AND ANOTHER V BAILEY AND ANOTHER
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
942			_n0
999			_c75219 _d75219