000			01264cab a2200217 4500
001			L129715
008			050516n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129715
041			_aeng
100			_aMurdoch, Sandi
245			_aBeyond the breaking point
260			_c2005
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0517) 30 April 2005, 121(1)
520			_aDiscusses the issues of tenants' break notices disputed by landlords. Landlords are more likely to dispute the operation of a tenant's break clause if the premises are difficult to relet. However, when interpreting a break notice, the courts will not tolerate any unrealistic arguments as shown in the cases, "Peer Freeholds Ltd v Clean Wash International Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 179 (Ch)) and "John Laing Construction Ltd v Amber Pass Ltd" ([2004] EGLR 128). There are no set procedures for yielding up: the facts must show that the tenant asserts no right over the premises and that nothing hinder re-entry by the landlord.
590			_aIKA190505
650			_aPEER FREEHOLDS LTD V CLEAN WASH INTERNATIONAL LTD
650			_aJOHN LAING CONSTRUCTION LTD V AMBER PASS LTD
650			_aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
690			_aLandlord and tenant _96252
942			_n0
999			_c75227 _d75227