| 000 | 00887cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB2916-25 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1993 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u11794 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aEstate agent's fees | ||
| 260 | _c1993 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aIndependent on Sunday _v25 April 1993, 18(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn "Chasen Ryder and Co v Hedges" (CA, Abs48321) the CA decided that the first estate agent, who introduced the vendor to the property, was not entitled to commission. The second estate agent, who approached the vendor with details of redevelopment of the property, were held to have been the 'effective cause' of the sale. | ||
| 650 | _aCHASEN RYDER AND CO V HEDGES | ||
| 650 | _aEFFECTIVE CAUSE | ||
| 650 | _aESTATE AGENTS' COMMISSION | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c7529 _d7529 |
||