000			01557cab a2200205 4500
001			L129869
008			050601n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129869
041			_aeng
245			_aAmrit Holdings Company Limited v Shahbakti
260			_c2005
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v149(18) 6 May 2005, 530(1)
490			_aCommercial Leases _v19(5) May 2005, 985-986 (2)
520			_aBoth articles examine the recent judgment "Amrit Holdings Company Limited v Shahbakhti" ([2005] EWCA Civ 339, [2005] L&TR 18) concerning residential possession by a landlord where suitable alternative accommodation was available for the tenant. In "Buy-to-let: bad bet", William Geldart warns that periodic tenants who invest in buy-to-let properties may be putting their own homes at risk and that the problem may become more acute in 2006 when it becomes possible to hold residential property in some pension plans. In "Residential possession - landlord's case for suitable alternative accommodation" the author states that the Court of Appeal does not often review the circumstances in which a landlord may recover possession of residential premises and concludes that it remains difficult for landlords to recover premises from statutory tenants and with 'reside' as opposed to 'principle residence' remaining a high test for landlords to meet.
590			_aIKA070605
650			_aAMRIT HOLDINGS CO LTD V SHAHBAKTI
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
700			_aGeldart, William
942			_n0
999			_c75311 _d75311