000			01503cab a2200205 4500
001			L129974
008			050610n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u129974
041			_aeng
100			_aBingham, Tony
245			_aDevoured by their house
260			_c2005
490			_aBuilding _v270(8380) 6 May 2005, 64-65(2)
520			_aDiscusses the events of "Burchell v Bullard and others", ([2005] EWCA Civ, 358, Independent 21 April 2005). The Bullards (R) were in dispute with their builder (A) over an extension to their house. The original trial judge decided that R's approach to their potential damages was exaggerated and as a result they only got 13% of what they claimed. The CA disagreed with the allocation of the costs order and made R pay their costs and 60% of A's costs. Argues that the litigation was very wasteful for a minor complaint worth £3 500 and recommends that courts could order an expert determination, the appointment of an arbitrator with the powers to conduct an enquiry. The arbitrator could use specialist knowledge to investigate a particular area as he would as an expert.
590			_aIKA210605
650			_aBURCHELL V BULLARD AND OTHERS
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-INDEPENDENT EXPERT DETERMINATION
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/358.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75375 _d75375