000 01423cab a2200289 4500
001 L130045
008 050617n2005 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u130045
041 _aeng
245 _aNCR Ltd v Riverland Portfolio No 1 Ltd (No 2)
260 _c2005
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v[2005] 22 EG 134-141(8)
520 _a[2005] EWCA Civ 312, 21 March 2005. Considered whether the appellant landlord (R) had made its decison to refuse consent to a subletting in reasonable time. "Held": the appeal was allowed. The decision had been made within a reasonable time from the date of the letter sent by the claimant tenant (N) formally requesting a sublet.
590 _aIKA210605
650 _aNCR LTD V RIVERLAND PORTFOLIO NO 1 LTD
650 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
650 _aASHWORTH FRAZER LTD V GLOUCESTER CITY COUNCIL
650 _aNORWICH UNION LIFE LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V SHOPMOOR LTD
650 _aFOOTWEAR CORPORATION LTD V AMPLIGHT PROPERTIES LTD
650 _aGO WEST LTD V SPIGAROLO AND ANOTHER
650 _aPIMMS LTD V TALLOW CHANDLERS COMPANY
650 _aBICKEL V DUKE OF WESTMINSTER
650 _aINTERNATIONAL DRILLING FLUIDS LTD V LOUISVILLE INVESTMENTS (UXBRIDGE) LTD
650 _aSTRAUDLEY INVESTMENTS LTD V MOUNT EDEN LAND LTD
690 _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT
942 _n0
999 _c75416
_d75416