| 000 | 01225cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L130051 | ||
| 008 | 050617n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u130051 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aGordon, Warren | ||
| 245 | _aCase law: Abbey v the Commissioners of Customs and Excise | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v70(22) 3 June 2005, 67(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscuses the case ([2005] EWHC 1187, unreported, L129866) involving a sale-and-leaseback agreement entered into by Abbey with Mapeley. The two companies ceated a virtual assignment by which Abbey would transfer all the economic burdens and benefits of the shorter leases to Mapely but pay a fee similar to the rent it would have paid under a normal leaseback. Customs and Excise claimed this fee should be charged VAT as it was a taxable supply of agency. However the court held that VAT was not chargeable as the arrangement should be regarded as a letting,nor would VAT be chargeable on property where Abbey had been granted the subleases and had transferred the economic benefit to Mapeley. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA210605 | ||
| 650 | _aABBEY V THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY TAXATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75422 _d75422 |
||