| 000 | 01074cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L130097 | ||
| 008 | 050621n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u130097 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aThompson, Max | ||
| 245 | _aAdjudication under fire | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aQS Week _v(8) 15 June 2005, 10-11(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses some of the problems associated with adjudication. Notes that for the majority of cases adjudication has achieved its aims but difficulties can occur with some of the processes which are open to abuse and affected by inflexible technical details. This last point can be illustrated in reference to "Pegram v Tally Wiejl (UK) Ltd" ([2003] EWCA Civ 1750, Abs67329) where the decision of the adjudication and a subsequent appeal were overturned due to there being no contract in writing. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA210605 | ||
| 650 | _aPEGRAM V TALLY WIEJL (UK) LTD | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75450 _d75450 |
||