000			01606cab a2200229 4500
001			L130257
008			050711n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130257
041			_aeng
100			_aPearlman, Jerry
245			_aNational Park purposes as material consideration
260			_c2005
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vJuly 2005, 890-893(4)
520			_aDiscusses National Park purposes and the duty of National Park authorities to foster the economic and social well-being of local communities within National Parks and whether these can come into potential conflict in the planning context. The purposes and the duty are set out in the Environment Act 1995 ss62 and 11(2) Considers whether National Park purposes are a material consideration or not by examining the inspector's report in the second deposit version of the Yorkshire Dales Second Local Plan and also the Bluestone decision, "Council for National Parks Ltd v Pembrokeshire Coast National Park Authority" ([2004] EWHC 2907 Admin, Abs68760). Concludes that National Park protection is so weak that if a better statement of the law does not emerge when Bluestone goes to the Court of Appeal, changes to the law will have to be pressed for.
590			_aIKA190705
650			_aR V PEMBROKESHIRE COAST NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY AND OTHERS EX P NATIONAL PARKS LTD
650			_aENVIRONMENT ACT 1995 S62
650			_aENVIRONMENT ACT 1995 s11(2)
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
700			_aPearlman-Hougie, Debbie
942			_n0
999			_c75519 _d75519