000			01915cab a2200205 4500
001			L130258
008			050711n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130258
041			_aeng
245			_aStancliffe Stone Company Limited v Peak District National Park Authority
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] EWCA Civ 747, 17 June 2005. Appeal by quarry owner (S) against the decision ([2004] EWHC 1475 (QB) refusing declarations that a1952 planning permission remained active and that two quarries could be worked in accordance with that permission. The site was a phase 1 site under the Environment Act 1995 Sched 13 para 2(4) within a National Park and whose planning permission was granted pre-1982. The two quarries were listed as dormant sites but S contended that the two sites were part of a single active mineral site covered by the 1952 permission and should be declared active and workable. "Held": appeal dismissed. The 1952 permission no longer authorised the continuance of minerals development at that site. A judicial review would be needed to set aside the list and to challenge a 1996 decision already acted upon would be formidably difficult. The judge had correctly rejected the submission that the list could be read to include the quarries in a single site. If the scheme under the Act was to work properly then a challenge to the list must be made prior to the application dates specified in the list and conditions determined under Sched 13 para 9.
590			_aIKA190705
650			_aSTANCLIFFE STONE COMPANY LTD V PEAK DISTRICT NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY
650			_aENVIRONMENT ACT 1995 SCHEDULE 13 PARA 2(4)
650			_aENVIRONMENT ACT 1995 SCHEDULE 13 PARA 9
690			_aPROPERTY-RURAL AND NATURAL ASSETS-MINERAL RESOURCES
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/747.html _zView the decision free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75520 _d75520