000			01394cab a2200181 4500
001			L130394
008			050725n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130394
041			_aeng
100			_aWarwick, Mark
245			_aFinal injunctions
260			_c2005
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v(824) (2) 8 July 2005, 823-824(2)
520			_aLooks at the court's approach to the grant of final injunctions by examining three cases. "Jaggard v Sawyer" ([1995] 13 EG 132-140, Abs52507) and "Mortimer v Bailey " ([2004] EWCA Civ 1514, Abs68661) deal with restrictive covenants and look at the interplay between the presence or absence of an application for interim relief and the grant of a final injunction. These cases show that it is important to win at first instance since an injunction is a discretionary remedy, that it is essential to clearly warn the defaulter that he is going ahead at his own risk if an application is not to be made for interim relief and that the party with the benefit of the covenant is well advised to seek injunctive relief at the earliest opportunity. The third case "British Glass Manufacturers Confederation v the University of Sheffield" ([2003] EWHC Civ 3108) concerns the long lease of commercial premises.
590			_aIKA020805
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL
942			_n0
999			_c75596 _d75596