000			01609cab a2200193 4500
001			L130436
008			050728n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130436
041			_aeng
245			_aWilliam Verry (Glazing Systems) Ltd v Furlong Homes Ltd
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] EWHC 138 (TCC), 13 January 2005. Discusses the issue of whether a responding party can submit new material in its response to adjudication and looked at the definition of a dispute. The claimant (V) had entered into a contract with the defendant (F) but significant delays led t F granting V two extensions of time. V argued that they were entitled to a longer extension but this claim was rejected by F. F commenced a reverse adjudication in relation to the final account dispute between them and V. A response by V contained a slightly different date for the extension of time and F argued that this was a new extension of time claim. "Held": the different date was held to be an enhancement or refinement of V's earlier claim. Even if the extension of time claim was a new one, it formed part of the dispute which was referred by F and V were entitled to rely upon it in an adjudication.
590			_aIKA020805
650			_aEDMUND NUTTALL LTD V R G CARTER LTD
650			_aWILLIAM VERRY LTD V FURLONG HOMES LTD
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/138.html _zView the item free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75617 _d75617