000			01216cab a2200181 4500
001			L130444
008			050728n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130444
041			_aeng
245			_aFairgate International Ltd v Citibank International plc
260			_c2005
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 27 EG 222-225(4)
520			_a[2005] EWCA Civ 569, 12 May 2005. Case involved a poorly worded lease which resulted in a dispute over works required on expiry. Citibank (C) were granted a leases and were obliged to yield the premises in good repair. Two further clauses required that C remove all its fixtures it had installed, return the property to its original condition, and to fit out the premises as a high-quality office building. F served notice, but C argued that that the clauses were mutually exclusive and only yielded the property in good repair. "Held:" the CA upheld the lower court's decision that the notice had been validly served. (See also L130050)
590			_aIKA020805
650			_aFAIRGATE INTERNATIONAL V CITIBANK INTERNATIONAL
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES
942			_n0
999			_c75623 _d75623