| 000 | 01283cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L130651 | ||
| 008 | 050822n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u130651 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, Geoff | ||
| 245 | _aAdjudication and insolvency | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v429(6538) 17 August 2005, 30(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the circumstances in which the decision of an adjudicator might not be enforced by the court where the successful party was shown to be in financial difficulties as considered in the case Wimbledon Construction Co v Derek Vago. The case provides guiding principles on dealing with a situation where a stay of execution should be given in the event of uncertainty about the successful party's financial position. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA300805 | ||
| 650 | _aWIMBLEDON CONSTRUCTION CO 2000 LTD V VAGO | ||
| 650 | _aBOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AGREEMENTS | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/1086.html&query=vago&method=all _zView the law report free of charge at www.bailii.org... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75756 _d75756 |
||