000			01728cab a2200289 4500
001			L130784
008			050825n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130784
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBingham, Tony
245	0	2	_aA wardance
260			_c2005
490		0	_aBuilding _v270(8395) 26 August 2005, 44-45(2)
520			_aDiscusses the case "Bryen and Langley Limited v Martin Boston" (L130706) which looks at the problems caused by the way contracts are entered into. An adjudicator decided the dispute over an underpayment but Boston (M) argued that JCT 98 was not included in the contract and therefore no adjudication could apply. The case went to the Court of Appeal where the judge held that the parties had agreed to contract on JCT98 and that, as a consumer, (M) was not outside the adjudication rules and therefore was not protected as such by the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.
590			_aIKA300805
650	2	4	_aBRYEN AND LANGLEY LTD V BOSTON
650	2	4	_aUNFAIR TERMS IN CONSUMER CONTRACT REGULATIONS 1999
650	2	4	_aHARVEY SHOPFITTERS LTD V ADI LTD
650	2	4	_aSTENT FOUNDATIONS LTD V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION (CONTRACTS) LTD (FORMERLY TARMAC CONSTRUCTION (CONTRACTS) LTD
650	2	4	_aVON HATZFELDT-WILDENBURG V ALEXANDER
650	2	4	_aPEGRAM SHOPFITTERS LIMITED V TALLY WEIJL (UK) LIMITED
650	2	4	_aPICARDI V CUNIBERTI AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aDIRECTOR GENERAL OF FAIR TRADING V FIRST NATIONAL BANK PLC
650	2	4	_aLOWNDS V HOME OFFICE
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS-ADJUDICATORS' JURISDICTION
942			_n0
999			_c75790 _d75790