000			01097cab a2200205 4500
001			L130841
008			050905n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130841
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBingham, Tony
245	0	0	_aOffensive manoeuvres
260			_c2005
490		0	_aBuilding _v270(8396) 2 September 2005, 54-55(2)
520			_aDiscusses the issue raised in the case "Sinclair v Woods of Winchester and another", ([2005] EWHC 1631(QB), unreported), whereby a decision reached by an adjudicator can be overturned in court while one reached by an arbitrator cannot - unless the claimant establishes that he is incompetent. The implication is that while arbitrators are encouraged to actively carry out arbitration they may find themselves liable to a personal attack for conduct inconsistent with due process.
590			_aIKA130905
650	2	4	_aARBITRATION ACT 1996
650	2	4	_aSINCLAIR V WOODS OF WINCHESTER AND ANOTHER
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION-ARBITRATORS
942			_n0
999			_c75825 _d75825