000			01787cab a2200205 4500
001			L130855
008			050907n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u130855
041			_aeng
100			_aRoss, Jonathan
245			_aCase news: Dogan v Semali Investments
260			_c2005
490			_aProperty Week _v70(34) 26 August 2005, 63(1)
520			_aConsiders "Dogan v Semali Investments" ([2005] EWCA Civ 1036, [2005] 50 EG 92-97(6)defendant landlord (S) appealed against judege's decision under section 30(1)(f) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. Under this section of the Act, a landlord can oppose renewal of a lease of business premises if it can show an intention to demolish, reconstruct or carry out extensive construction works. S had gained planning permission to carry out an extension to it's property. However this work was dependant on gaining access to the property via an agreement with an NHS trust. At the original trial these negotiations had broken down, and S produced expert evidence that stated that the scheme could go ahead in a limited manner without the access. The judge did not believe that the landlord had any intention to proceeding with the scheme and accordingly decided that the tenant should have a new lease. The CA disagreed with the judge, and that, he did not have proper regard for the expert evidence. In addition S had gained planning consent for the revised scheme.
590			_aIKA130905
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-COMMERCIAL LEASE RENEWAL
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2005/1036.html _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75839 _d75839