| 000 | 01116cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L130916 | ||
| 008 | 050919n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u130916 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aHendriks, Dave | |
| 245 | _aApportionment in property valuation: should we seperate the inseperable? | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Property Investment and Finance _v23(5) 2005, 455-470(15) |
||
| 520 | _aProperty valuers are often asked to allocate portions of the market value of a property to parts of the subject property. This paper aims to illustrate that the market value of a property cannot be divided into market value for the land and a market value for the improvement. Apportionment methods that exist in practice are briefly addressed and shortcomings identified. Shows that the existing apportionment methods are unreliable tools for property analysis, and makes some suggestions concerning tools that might replace apportionment in property analysis. [Taken from journal abstract.] | ||
| 590 | _aIKA270905 | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY VALUATION AND APPRAISAL | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75879 _d75879 |
||