000			01826cab a2200205 4500
001			L131036
008			050922n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131036
041	0		_aeng
100			_aGordon, Warren
245	0	0	_aCase news: (1) Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of London (2) Wardens and Commonalty of the Mystery of Mercers in the City of London v (1)Intercede 1765 Ltd (2) Intercede 1766 Ltd
260			_c2005
490		0	_aProperty Week _v70(36) 9 September 2005, 67(1)
520			_aThis case ([2005] EWHC 1691 (Ch), [2005] NPC 103) examined and interpreted a deed to decide on the height limit of a development. At the time of construction in the 1920s of the Lloyds building, a deed was entered into relating to both the Lloyds building and the Royal Exchange opposite. Following its sale in 2002, the Lloyds building was to be developed together with adjacent sites. Planning permission was obtained and the owner I entered into negotiations with C the owners of the Royal Exchange to modify the existing deed. Development works commenced but negotiations broke down. Now committed to following through with the planned development, I claimed that its plans did not exceed the height restriction. "Held:" that the development was not in breach of the deed. The court noted that some parts of the building could be higher, if stepped back from the front, and that elements of the original building were higher than stated in the deed.
590			_aIKA270905
650	2	4	_aCORPORATION OF LONDON LBC V INTERCEDE 1765 AND ANOTHER
690			_aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2005/1691.html&query=intercede&method=all _zView the case free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75911 _d75911