| 000 | 01117cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | L131062 | ||
| 008 | 050923n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u131062 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aMurdoch, Sandi | |
| 245 | 2 | _aA gamble that backfired | |
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0537) 17 September 2005, 147(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses "Crestfort Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd" ([2005] EWHC 805 (Ch), L130057). Tenants seeking to offload surplus properties which prove to be unmarketable on current terms can opt to sublet on the best available terms. It is common however for leases to allow subletting only on the existing basis and often at the same rent and attempts to sidestep such conditions are usually unsuccessful. In "Crestfort" the sublease was deemed to have been illegally granted and the court ordered its surrender and awarded damages. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA270905 | ||
| 650 | _aCRESFORT LTD V TESCO STORES LTD | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-COMMERCIAL LEASES-BREACHING COMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c75934 _d75934 |
||