000			01942cab a2200181 4500
001			##L131138
008			051003n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131138
041	0		_aeng
245	0	0	_aR (on the application of Weir, Khattar and Kaner) v London Borough of Camden
260			_c2005
520			_a[2005] EWHC 1875 (Admin), 28 July 2005. Concerns the failure of a local planning authority to acknowledge an objection from another local planning authority before granting planning permission for the development of premises located on the boundary between the two authorities. The defendant local planning authority, Camden LBC (C), had received objections to the planning application from the local community association on grounds of amenity referring to noise, visitor numbers and highway safety issues. The City of Westminster (W), a statutory consultee as it exercised planning control on the other side of the boundary, also had concerns in respect of harm to residential amenity but did not submit any written objection by the end of the consultation period. C's development control sub-committee was unaware of W's objection when it granted planning permission. The claimants (WE) applied for judicial review contending that C had failed to have regard to a material consideration, W's objection and its terms. "Held": the permission should be quashed. C had failed to have regard to a material consideration namely W's objection and the terms of it. The committee might well have attached greater weight to the objections had it been aware that W supported them.
590			_aIKA111005
650	2	4	_aR V CAMDEN LBC EX P WEIR
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING APPLICATIONS
856	4	0	_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2005/1875.html _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org...
942			_n0
999			_c75964 _d75964