000			01048cab a2200193 4500
001			##L131277
008			051017n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131277
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aBrewer, Geoff
245	0	0	_aCovenant restriction
260			_c2005
490		0	_aContract Journal _v430(6545) 5 October 2005, 20(1)
520			_aDiscusses "Mortimer v Bailey"([2004] EWCA Civ 1514, Abs68661) where M applied for a mandatory injunction to remove an extension erected by the owners of the neighbouring property, B, on the grounds that it had been built in breach of a restrictive covenant. It was held that an injunction was an appropriate remedy. M had informed B upon commencement of the building works that they did not consent to the extension, and that proceedings were contemplated. In this case, damages would not be adequate compensation.
590			_aIKA251005
650	2	4	_aMORTIMER AND ANOTHER V BAILEY AND ANOTHER
690			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c76017 _d76017