000			01350cab a2200193 4500
001			##L131282
008			051017n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131282
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aAtkinson, Daniel
245	0	0	_aComplicated cases need a response time
260			_c2005
490		0	_aConstruction News _v(6936) 29 September 2005, 17(1)
520			_aDiscusses the implications for adjudicators and arbitrators in the construction industry of the HC decision in "Cameroon Airlines v Transnet Ltd" ([2004] EWHC 1829 (Comm), unreported). C appealed from a decision by an arbitration tribunal, which had been based upon a matter introduced for the first time in T's closing submission, and which had not previously been raised by either party. The appeal was allowed, on the basis that the tribunal had acted unfairly by not giving C an opportunity of addressing it on the matter raised, thereby causing substantial injustice. The case shows that it is vital for arbitrators to adopt a method of valuation to which all parties have an opportunity to respond, no matter how sensible another method may seem.
590			_aIKA251005
650	2	4	_aCAMEROON AIRLINES V TRANSNET LTD
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION-ARBITRATORS
942			_n0
999			_c76021 _d76021