000			01620cab a2200241 4500
001			##L131348
008			051021n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131348
041	0		_aeng
245			_aTennant and another v Adamczyk and another
260	3		_c2005
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v[2005] 41 EG 205 (CS) (1)
520			_aCA, 4 October 2005. Concerns whether the appellants' title to disputed land was time-barred and extinguished by virtue of the Limitation Act 1980 ss15 and 17 and Sched 1, read in conjunction with the Land Registration Act 2002. The disputed land was a yard falling between business units owned by the appellants (T) and the respondents (A). T brought proceedings against A claiming trespass and seeking a declaration as to ownership. A counterclaimed that T's title to the disputed land was time-barred and extinguished. The judge dismissed T's claim and accepted A's submissions that their use of the land from June to October 1991 amounted to adverse possession. T appealed. "Held": appeal allowed. The judge had to ask whether T had been dispossessed and whether A had been in adverse possession by October 1991. He had erred in relying on events occurring after October 1991.
590			_aIKA251005
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S15
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980 S17
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980 SCHED 1
650	2	4	_aLAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002
650	2	4	_aTENNANT V ADAMCZYK
650			_aJ A PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL-REGISTRATION OF TITLE TO PROPERTY-LAND REGISTRATION
942			_n0
999			_c76055 _d76055