| 000 | 01247cab a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L131534 | ||
| 008 | 051114n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u131534 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aHarvey, Chris | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aTake a balanced view |
| 260 | 3 | _c2005 | |
| 490 | 0 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0544) 5 November 2005, 130-131(2) |
|
| 520 | _aWarns that landlords insisting on onerous provisions in commercial leases should be aware of the potentially negative repercussions at rent review. Looks at the possible effect on review of a number of common onerous provisions: user provisions, repairing obligations, alteration provisions, keep open covenants and break options, uninsured risks and other lease provisions. Lists examples of allowances. Recommends that landlords think about the potential long-term effects of these clauses when negotiating leases. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA221105 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aPLINTH PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LTD V MOTT HAY AND ANDERSON |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aNORWICH UNION LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY V BRITISH RAILWAYS |
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-LEASEHOLD COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-RENT REVIEW (BUSINESS TENANCIES) | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aPanton, Nigel | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76145 _d76145 |
||