000			01306cab a2200181 4500
001			##L131600
008			051118n2005 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u131600
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aRoss, Jonathan
245	0	0	_aLove and Care v Kiernan, Turcsi and Harness
260			_c2005
490		0	_aProperty Week _v70(43) 28 October 2005, 67(1)
520			_aIn this case ([2005] EWHC 2180 (Ch), (2005) NPC 117) H leased a property to L upon very benevolent terms. Upon the death of H, executors of his estate disputed the terms of the lease, on the grounds that L had in some way influenced this elderly man to act so much in their favour. In the event of L losing the case, K also pursued an application for security of costs, believing that the claimants would not be in a position to pay their costs due to lack of funds. As K had initiated the whole of the proceedings by registering a caution on the property with the Land Registry, the court ruled that the defendants in this case could be classed as claimants; therefore their claim for security of costs was denied. Under no circumstances are claimants ever awarded this security.
650	2	4	_aLOVE AND CARE LTD V KIERNAN, TURSCI AND HARNESS
690			_aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
942			_n0
999			_c76189 _d76189