| 000 | 01106cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L131628 | ||
| 008 | 051121n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u131628 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBrewer, Geoff | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 | _aThe co-ordination of building services drawings |
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aContract Journal _v431(6551) 16 November 2005 37(1) |
|
| 520 | _aDescribes and comments upon "Emcor Drake and Scull Ltd v Edinburgh Royal Joint Venture and others" ([2005] ScotCS CSOH134, unreported), where a dispute arose over whether building services drawings described as fully co-ordinated and approved for construction were in fact ready for installation. It was decided that in this instance, there were two stages of drawing co-ordination and despite the use of the words fully co-ordinated, design installation input was still required from the specialist sub-contractor. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA221105 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aEMCOR DRAKE AND SCULL LTD V EDINBURGH ROYAL JOINT VENTURE AND OTHERS |
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN-CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76204 _d76204 |
||