| 000 | 00819cab a2200181 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L131629 | ||
| 008 | 051121n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u131629 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aGallimore, Michael | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPlanning appeals |
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aProperty Week _v70(45) 11 November 2005, 75(1) |
|
| 520 | _aReviews two appeal cases which highlight the importance of good design in the planning process, especially if the proposed site for development is urban. C won their appeal because the inspector thought the new building would enhance the apprearance of the town. However, M & C lost their case, as the inspector ruled that the opposite was true. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA221105 | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT-CONSTRUCTION PLANNING | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76205 _d76205 |
||