| 000 | 01054cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132056 | ||
| 008 | 051222n2005 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132056 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aTaylor, Christina | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aDirty work |
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aQS Week _v(33) 7 December 2005, 11-13(3) |
|
| 520 | _aArgues that despite a number of incentives, the construction industry still considers the redevelopment of contaminated or brownfield land as a high-risk, low-profit operation. Recent complex legislation, such as the restrictions on the disposal of hazardous waste under the landfill directive (Directive 99/31/EC), have added to the difficulties, especially as the scope of some of the new rules are uncertain and yet to be tested in the courts. A separate article outlines a three phase plan for the remediation of contaminated land. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA030106 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDIRECTIVE 99/31/EC |
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-RURAL AND NATURAL ASSETS-LAND-CONTAMINATED LAND | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aKirby, Leydon | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76312 _d76312 |
||