| 000 | 00970cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132164 | ||
| 008 | 060117n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132164 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aKlein, Rudi | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aNo time to lose on variations |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aConstruction News _v(6949) 12 January 2006, 16(1) |
|
| 520 | _aGives the facts of, and comments upon, "Shawton Engineering v DGP International" ([2005] EWCA Civ 1359, L131718), where S terminated D's design subcontract on the grounds of delay. The court held that S had not been able to show that it had given reasonable notice making time of the essence. The author draws the conclusion that better communication between all those involved in the design process may well have avoided the litigation. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA170106 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSHAWTON ENGINEERING LTD V DGP INTERNATIONAL LTD AND ANOTHER |
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION MARKET | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76343 _d76343 |
||