| 000 | 01195cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132395 | ||
| 008 | 060203n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132395 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBrewer, Geoff | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aPFI contract terms clash with HGCR Act |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aContract Journal _v432(6560) 1 February 2006, 38(1) |
|
| 520 | _aReviews and comments upon "Midland Expressway v Carillion Construction and others" ([2005] EWHC 2963, L132321). The case highlights the fact that although PFI contracts are exempt from the provisions of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, construction agreements entered into by concession companies are not. Therefore, pay when paid clauses or those that seek to restrict a contractor's right to refer contract disputes to adjudication will be unenforceable. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA140206 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMIDLAND EXPRESSWAY V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD AND OTHERS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76418 _d76418 |
||