000			01369cab a2200229 4500
001			##L132470
008			060213n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u132470
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aVickers, Tony
245	0	0	_aKate's great mistake
260			_c2006
490		0	_aRegeneration and Renewal _v20 January 2006, 23(1)
520			_aCriticises Kate Barker's endorsement of Planning Gain Supplement (PGS) as a means of boosting housing supply and advocates the introduction of a land-value tax which would encourage efficient use of land in accordance with development plans. Claims Barker rejected land-value tax failing to recognise how it works elsewhere and failing to take on board advances in GIS and GIS policy. Outlines the authors' land-value tax research at Kingston University. The introduction of a land-value tax regime would have a considerable positive effect on land supply for housing whereas the proposed PGS has created uncertainty among developers and will certainly stem the flow of land onto the market.
590			_aIKA140206
650	2	4	_aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT
650	2	4	_aLAND VALUE TAXATION
650	2	4	_aBARKER REVIEW OF HOUSING SUPPLY: SECURING OUR FUTURE HOUSING NEEDS
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING REFORM
700	1		_aMorad, Munir
942			_n0
999			_c76464 _d76464