000			01303cab a2200217 4500
001			##L132591
008			060221n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u132591
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aParisotti, Melinda
245	0	0	_aYou can run...
260			_c2006
490		0	_aBuilding _v271(8418) 17 February 2006, 55(1)
520			_aGives the facts of, and comments upon, Baker and Davies plc v Leslie Wilks Associates ([2005] EWHC 1179 (TCC) [2005] BLC 425), where a claim was made by a contractor against an engineer under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978. The engineer's argument that the time limit for a claim for contribution had expired was rejected by the court. The author argues that if it had been upheld, the effect would be that a non-binding arrangement in the main action, which fell through after two years, would prevent contribution proceedings being brought, which was clearly not the intention of parliament when the Limitation Act 1980 was passed.
590			_a280206
650	2	4	_aBAKER AND DAVIES PLC V LESLIE WILKS ASSOCIATES
650	2	4	_aCIVIL LIABILITY (CONTRIBUTION) ACT 1978
650	2	4	_aLIMITATION ACT 1980
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ADVOCACY
942			_n0
999			_c76514 _d76514