| 000 | 01061cab a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132594 | ||
| 008 | 060221n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132594 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aLane, Nick | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | _aHow to be good |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v271(8418) 17 February 2006, 60(1) |
|
| 520 | _aLooks at the lack of concensus in the construction industry over the type of delay analysis to be used in delay claims. Argues that the technique used must be acceptable to other parties, and be sure of being approved by an adjudicator or court. Mentions some other factors to be considered when deciding on the technique. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA280206 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aDELAY ANALYSIS |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aASCON CONTRACTING LTD V ALFRED MCALPINE CONSTRUCTION (ISLE OF MAN) |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aJOHN BARKER CONSTRUCTION LTD V LONDON PORTMAN HOTEL LTD |
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aSKANSKA CONSTRUCTION UK LTD V EGGER (BARONY) LTD |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76517 _d76517 |
||