000			01178cab a2200193 4500
001			##L132625
008			060223n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u132625
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aWass, Douglas
245	0	0	_aJudgment call
260			_c2006
490		0	_aRIBA Journal _v113(2) 2 February 2006, 76(1)
520			_aExamines the implications of the decision in "Bryen and Langley Ltd v Boston" ([2005] EWCA Civ 973, L130706), where adjudication provisions were incorporated into a building contract for residential property. Makes clear that residential employers cannot evade the consequences of an adjudicator's decision where they propose a building contract incorporating adjudication provisions to a contractor and / or have been advised by a construction or legal professional. In these circumstances, there is a risk that the employer may claim the costs of the adjudication from his professional advisers.
590			_aIKA280206
650	2	4	_aBRYEN AND LANGLEY LTD V BOSTON
690			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
942			_n0
999			_c76532 _d76532