000			01165cab a2200193 4500
001			##L132707
008			060301n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u132707
041	0		_aeng
100	1		_aThomas, Daniel
245	0	0	_aUnited in opposition
260			_c2006
490		0	_aProperty Week _v71(8) 24 February 2006, 32-33(2)
520			_aThe property industry has joined forces with occupiers, pension funds, business groups and local authorities to fight against a fourth attempt to introduce a development land tax. It is claimed that the tax - known as Planning Gain Supplement - will have an adverse effect on infrastructure development, building communities and commercial land use. It is also argued that this new proposal is not likely to succeed any more than its previous incarnations because land values fluctuate so wildly. A draft by the British Property Federation has highlighted 10 reasons why the scheme is unworkable in order to make the government listen.
590			_aIKA140306
650	2	4	_aPLANNING GAIN SUPPLEMENT
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-PLANNING REFORM
942			_n0
999			_c76575 _d76575