| 000 | 01007cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132715 | ||
| 008 | 060302n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132715 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aPalles-Clark, Rob | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aDelay analysis _b the smart way forward |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aContract Journal _v432(6564) 1 March 2006, 31(1) |
|
| 520 | _aDiscusses the process involved in making a claim for an extension of time. Argues that the most difficult part of the process is establishing that an event that has or will cause delay is on the critical path of the work. This will differ depending on the life of the project. In an unfinished project, the effect of an event that has occurred, or is likely to occur, is considered prospectively, whilst if a project has been completed it is considered retrospectively. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA140306 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMOTHERWELL BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION LTD V MICAFIL VAKUUMTECHNIK |
| 690 |
_aConstruction management _96230 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76583 _d76583 |
||