| 000 | 01085cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132817 | ||
| 008 | 060310n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132817 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aWatson, P. | |
| 245 | 0 | 2 |
_aA critical evaluation of the partnering concept _bpart three partnering, a comparison with traditional and design-and-build contracts |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding Engineer _vMarch 2006, 26-29(4) |
|
| 520 | _aProvides a comparative analysis of the partnering process with traditional and design-and-build contracts used by the UK construction industry. The data was primarily compiled from questionnaires, interviews and case studies. Concludes that partnering is an improved method of contracting when compared to that of the traditional method, but cannot by itself satisfy all the industry's requirements. Contains pie charts, together with tables listing the advantages and disadvantages of partnering. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA140306 | ||
| 690 |
_aProcurement _96260 |
||
| 700 | 1 | _aKhatib, J. M. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aLindley, S. | |
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76645 _d76645 |
||