| 000 | 01084cab a2200193 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ##L132851 | ||
| 008 | 060314n2006 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u132851 | ||
| 041 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aBingham, Tony | |
| 245 | 0 | 4 | _aThe greater good |
| 260 | _c2006 | ||
| 490 | 0 |
_aBuilding _v271(8421) 10 March 2006, 60-61(2) |
|
| 520 | _aRelates the facts of, and comments upon, "Meadow v General Medical Council" ([2006] EWHC 146 Admin, unreported) which has implications for the disciplinary procedures of professional institutions and trade bodies in the construction industry. The case confirmed that, on grounds of public policy, arbitrators, adjudicators or expert witnesses cannot be sued or prosecuted for mistakes made or committed in good faith whilst involved in the judicial process, nor can they be punished for such errors by their professional institution. | ||
| 590 | _aIKA140306 | ||
| 650 | 2 | 4 | _aMEADOW V GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL |
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ADVOCACY | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c76663 _d76663 |
||