000			01366cab a2200253 4500
001			##
008			060320n2006 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u132899
100	1		_aThomas, Nigel
245	0	2	_aA narrow decision
260			_c2006
490		0	_aEstates Gazette _v(0610) 11 March 2006, 150-151(2)
520			_aAsks whether the "Pye v United Kingdom" ruling (L131742) which concerned the limited area of land registration has more far-reaching implications? Has it finished off the doctrine of adverse possession at least in respect of registered land? Concludes that the ruling is unlikely to open the floodgates of adverse possession cases but Convention rights are likely to play a continuing role in property law, especially where a person's enjoyment of possessions is disturbed by state intervention .
590			_aIKA280306
650	2	4	_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT,TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS EX P ALCONBURY DEVELOPERS LTD
650	2	4	_aJ A PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
650	2	4	_aPYE (OXFORD) LTD & ANOR V UNITED KINGDOM
650	2	4	_aWILSON V FIRST COUNTY TRUST LTD (NO. 2)
650	2	4	_aR V OXFORDSHIRE CC AND ANOTHER EX P SUNNINGWELL PARISH COUNCIL
650	2	4	_aOXFORDSHIRE CC V OXFORD CITY COUNCIL AND ANOTHER
650	2	4	_aBEAULANE PROPERTIES LTD V PALMER
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL
942			_n0
999			_c76678 _d76678